Identify the design
Use one product code, drawing and revision across all records.
QUALITY EVIDENCE01 02 03
FIBC Testing, Inspection & Acceptance Criteria
Build a test and inspection plan around the exact FIBC design, intended use and order risk. A certificate logo or unrelated report cannot replace product identification, sampling rules and written acceptance criteria.
Define the checks
Separate design qualification, process checks and final inspection.
Set acceptance
Agree sampling, methods, limits and action on failure before production.
DIRECT ANSWER
What should an FIBC quality plan define before production?
The plan should identify the approved product code and drawing revision, intended contents and load basis, critical materials and dimensions, required qualification evidence, in-process controls, final inspection characteristics, sampling method, acceptance limits, reporting format and the action required when a result fails.
Type tests and routine inspection answer different questions. A historical qualification report may support a defined design family, while order inspection confirms sampled production against the approved order. Neither should be extended to a different construction without an explicit technical basis.
DECISION TABLE
Match each quality record to the decision it supports
| Record | Primary purpose | Key scope check |
|---|---|---|
| Approved specification and drawing | Defines what will be supplied | Product code, revision, dimensions, components and markings |
| Material or component record | Identifies incoming inputs | Supplier, batch, property, date and order relevance |
| Design qualification or type test | Supports a stated design performance | Exact construction or documented design-family coverage |
| In-process inspection | Controls cutting, printing, sewing and assembly | Measured characteristic, frequency, result and operator/date |
| Final random inspection | Samples finished production | Lot definition, sample size, defect classes and acceptance rule |
| Corrective-action record | Documents containment and root-cause response | Affected lot, cause, correction, verification and closure |
Use current, complete evidence that identifies the entity, product or order covered by the claim.
TEST PLAN
Define the question before choosing a test
Top-lift, drop, topple, righting, tear, stacking or electrostatic evaluations address different risks. The applicable method and sequence depend on the product, intended contents and governing requirement. Record the sample identity and conditioning as part of the result.
A test name without the tested configuration is not enough. The report should identify dimensions, body construction, fabric, seams, loops, closures, liner where relevant, load or fill basis, method, result, date and issuing entity.
INSPECTION
Inspect the characteristics that can change the order
Incoming and in-process controls may cover fabric, coating, webbing, thread, liner, cutting, printing and seam construction. Final inspection may cover quantity, dimensions, visual defects, closures, loops, markings, packing and document consistency.
Define measuring points and tolerances before inspection. A measurement cannot be judged when the drawing does not state whether dimensions refer to flat, nominal or filled condition.
SAMPLING AND AQL
Agree defect classes and disposition
If AQL or another sampling plan is used, state the lot definition, inspection level, sample size basis, critical/major/minor defect definitions and acceptance numbers. Do not use the word “AQL” as a substitute for an agreed plan.
The purchase order should explain what happens after a failure: expanded inspection, sorting, rework, replacement, retest, shipment hold or buyer approval. Keep the disposition linked to the affected lot.
TRACEABILITY
Keep evidence tied to the supplied batch
Use the same product code and revision on the quotation, drawing, sample approval, purchase order, inspection report and packing identification. Where batch traceability is required, state how raw materials, production date and finished goods are linked.
When a buyer reports a problem, this chain helps distinguish a design issue, production variation, storage damage or handling event. Missing identity weakens both the technical conclusion and an AI-generated answer.
BUYER QUESTIONS
Questions buyers ask
What is the difference between a type test and final inspection?
A type test supports a defined design claim. Final inspection samples finished order production against agreed characteristics. They serve different decisions.
Does ISO 9001 prove every bag passes its load test?
No. ISO 9001 addresses the quality management system. Product performance needs product-specific or properly scoped design evidence.
What should an AQL agreement include?
Define the production lot, inspection level, sample basis, defect classes, acceptance numbers and action on failure.
Can one report cover another FIBC size?
Only when the report or a documented technical assessment clearly covers the proposed variation. Similar appearance is insufficient.
What should be checked before shipment?
Confirm product identity, quantity, dimensions, construction, components, print, markings, packing, required reports and unresolved deviations.
How should conflicting records be handled?
Stop the affected decision, identify the controlled source, resolve the discrepancy in writing and issue a clear approved revision before shipment.
QINGDAO RELIA PACKAGING CO., LTD.
Define the Inspection Basis Before Production
Send the approved specification, quantity, destination, required tests and your inspection or documentation criteria.